Welcome to, where you can propose ideas, constitutional amendments and receive feedback from other members.

Article V, U.S. Constitution

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.


Require a "NOA" (None of the Above) choice on for all offices. [vote]

7 like 1 dislike
Any time that the voter deems that no candidate running for office is a fair choice, the voter should be allowed to express his/her rejection of those candidates by casting a "None of the Above" vote. voting
Strongly Agree (2 votes, 50%)
Agree (1 vote, 25%)
Partialy Agree (0 votes)
Activly Abstain (0 votes)
Mostly Disagree (0 votes)
Disagree (0 votes)
Strongly Disagree (1 vote, 25%)
Jun 23, 2013 wethecom 1,590
recategorized Jun 23, 2013 by wethecom

4 Replys

1 like 0 dislike
This is one solution or part of a solution to the problem that voters have been muzzled for too long.
Jul 4, 2013 William Waugh 660
0 like 0 dislike
What would you do if they all had "none of the above"? No president, no governor, etc.
Jun 28, 2013 KSigel 430
wash rinse and repeat sounds good to me
Suppose a "none of the above" vote has no effect on the outcome of the election whatsoever.  It is still a good idea.  I have often looked at a ballot and thought, "Are these really the best candidates the parties could come up with.  Casting no vote at all in such situation sends no message.  Imagine if at the end of an election, when the news media has to report the results, they have to report a large percentage of "none of the above" votes.  At least it destroys the credibility of the winner if he proclaims having a mandate.  It may set the stage for better candidates in the next election when the parties try to figure out why so many "none of the above" votes were cast and what it takes to get them to vote differently the next time.
i would have to say it would have legal effects in court for proving invalidation of the system or person or whatever the court case may pertain to
If you do not say what the effect of a "none of the above" is, you can't predict how the courts will interpret it.  It isn't always possible to predict how the courts will interpret something even when you do spell it out.
scenario "75 percent vote none of the above "
legally we could call for another election or a convention to determine what to do about it. its just evidence of popular opinion rather than no opinion
0 like 0 dislike
There is also the same problem that happened between Bush/Gore blaming Nader for the Gore loss.
Jul 10, 2013 anonymous
0 like 0 dislike
Are you familiar with Voters for None of the Above?
Apr 2, 2014 skyhawkmaintainer 290